
(Image stolen from Beyazperde.)
Not much about Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins either: people have said it's the best of the Batman franchise -- followed almost always by "Which isn't saying much," although in this case it is. It's an excellent popcorn movie, and there's real visual pleasure to be had at the glorious mess of metal and fire and steam at the end (the Poeta kept calling that part "sexy," and I think I know what she means).
The bad thing about "origin" movies is that the audience knows what happens next; the good thing about it is the leisurely way by which Batman's persona and surrounding trappings -- the bats, the cave, the Batmobile -- is slowly revealed to the audience and Bruce Wayne himself. In this respect the farfetched plot, involving a water vaporizer that makes little logical sense, is mere window dressing; the real story is Wayne coming to grips with his own identity and past (kind of like Guy Pearce in Nolan's Memento).
Christian Bale isn't half bad -- he's certainly better than any of his predecessors, and he has a mean, inscrutable look to his face that fits the Dark Knight persona -- and he is surrounded by an impeccable cast, after all, with at least a couple of Oscars between them. (Except for Katie Holmes, who looks all of nineteen, as an assistant D.A.; the fact that Christian Bale looked, at certain angles, like Risky Business-era Tom Cruise did not help at all. I'm trying to restrain myself from reproducing the whole Tom - Rob - Scarlett - Jessica - Lindsay - Katie story here, but it's easy enough to Google.)
But the best of the cast was an almost unrecognizable, Bill Macy-ish Gary Oldman, as a (then) Sgt. Gordon, making Batman Begins my favorite Oldman movie since Peter Medak's Romeo Is Bleeding. (I was going to write that Oldman's rumpled, lived-in character nicely anchors the film in some sort of external reality, but Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman perform this function as well.) At least it's good to see Oldman not play the kind of sweaty psycho role that used to go to the far less talented Dennis Hopper.
Posted by the wily filipino at July 12, 2005 12:34 AMyes, i really *loved* gary oldman as gordon. what's the male equivalent of 'frumpy,' but w/o the negative connotations? ok, maybe rumpled as you say. so fuzzy :-)
ok, so when do we go see the willie wonka movie? call me.
Posted by: poeta on July 12, 2005 10:08 AMI whole-heartedly agree with my whole heart. Plus, I heart Gary Oldman in nearly every role he's ever done (yes, even the white rasta-wannabe character in True Romance)...
Posted by: Jesse! on July 12, 2005 11:54 AMOh I totally forgot about "True Romance!"
"He must have thought it was white boy day. It ain't white boy day, is it?"
Turkey, do you have an electronic copy of your Would You Believe? paper? I was talking about it with some friends the other day...
i'm glad i wasn't the only one to see an eerie christian bale-tom cruise resemblance. i was freaking myself out thinking my head was brainwashed by christian scientists.
are you going to go see willy wonka? i was going to, but was oddly disturbed the by previews. there's something inappropriately michael jackson in neverland about it...
Posted by: Lunamania on July 12, 2005 10:58 PMi'm probably the only one who hasn't seen this movie...
Posted by: diwata on July 13, 2005 06:49 AMnow you all stop it with that christian bale-tom cruise thing! i'm disturbed.
on gary oldman. let us not forget he played both SID VICIOUS and BEETHOVEN. yes.
Posted by: poeta on July 13, 2005 10:31 PMChristian Bale-Tom Cruise / Howl-Michael Jackson -- come to think of it, they're *all* Christian Bale!
I know I'm late to the fun, but I have to agree with Poeta here on the Christian Bale/Tom Cruise thing.... Bale's drawling voice and slow grin reminded me more of Southern boy Matthew McConaughey than anyone else (they kinda look alike, too). Meanwhile, Cruise reminds me of a buzzing gnat with his staccato, rapid-fire delivery and jumping around on couches. It's all Katie Holmes's fault!
Posted by: Gladys on July 15, 2005 10:42 PM